Masonry gives you options, and that is a good thing. Two of the most common choices are brick and CMU, short for concrete masonry unit. Both are strong, durable, and proven. Still, they serve different roles. Understanding brick vs CMU helps you build smarter across New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Philadelphia.
This guide compares the two materials in plain terms. You will learn where each one shines and how to match the right choice to your project. For a full overview of your options, start with our masonry materials page.
Brick is a classic masonry unit made from fired clay. It has shaped buildings for thousands of years, and for good reason. Brick offers timeless beauty, strong durability, and excellent fire resistance.
In the brick vs CMU comparison, brick usually wins on appearance. Its warm color and texture give buildings a finished, refined look. Architects across Philadelphia and the surrounding region choose brick when facade design matters. These qualities are part of the broader benefits of masonry that owners value.
CMU stands for concrete masonry unit, often called concrete block. It is a larger, hollow unit made from concrete. CMU is a workhorse material valued for strength and speed.
In the brick vs CMU discussion, CMU often wins on structure and cost. Its size means walls go up faster, and its strength suits load-bearing applications. Many buildings use CMU for the structural core and brick for the visible face. This pairing delivers strength and beauty at once.
Both materials are strong, but they carry load differently. CMU excels in structural roles. Its hollow cells can hold reinforcing steel and grout, which boosts strength for tall or load-bearing walls.
Brick performs well too, especially in veneer and bearing walls. For many projects in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, the smart move is to combine them. Skilled union masonry contractors know how to install both correctly so the wall performs as designed.
Budget and schedule shape every project. CMU often costs less per square foot of wall because each unit covers more area. Fewer units mean faster installation.
Brick can cost more, but it delivers a premium finished look that adds value. The right balance depends on your goals. Our design resources help specifiers weigh cost against performance for each application.
There is no single winner in brick vs CMU on cost. The best answer depends on where the material sits in the wall.
Labor also shapes the final number. CMU units are larger, so a crew covers more wall in less time. Brick takes more hands and more hours because each unit is small and placement matters for appearance. A skilled contractor helps you balance material cost against labor for the best overall value in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Philadelphia.
Here both materials excel. Brick and CMU resist fire because neither burns. Both also stand up to weather, pests, and time. This shared strength is why masonry protects buildings across Philadelphia and the region.
For owners focused on long-term safety, either choice is sound. The decision comes down to structure, appearance, and budget rather than durability. This resilience supports EBA’s mission to promote strong, safe masonry.
Choose brick when appearance leads the design. Facades, entrances, and public-facing walls often call for brick. Choose CMU when structure and speed matter most, such as load-bearing walls and back-up construction.
On many projects, you use both. CMU forms the strong core, and brick provides the finished face. This pairing is common on schools, hospitals, and commercial buildings that need both strength and a polished look. You can see this approach in action across our masonry projects throughout the region.
Your climate and building code also guide the choice. Load requirements, fire ratings, and wall thickness all factor in. A knowledgeable contractor reads these needs and specifies the right mix for your site in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, or Philadelphia.
For a look at how these materials support greener building, read our piece on sustainable masonry.
The brick vs CMU decision is not about which material is better overall. It is about which material fits each part of your building. Brick brings beauty. CMU brings structural strength and speed. Used well, together they build stronger, safer projects.
If you are planning a build in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, or Philadelphia, get expert guidance. Reach out through EBA Connects to match the right masonry to your project.
Brick is a small fired-clay unit prized for appearance and durability. CMU is a larger hollow concrete block valued for structural strength and fast installation. Many buildings use both together.
Often, yes. CMU covers more wall area per unit and installs faster, which lowers labor cost. Brick can cost more but adds a premium finished look.
Absolutely. A common approach uses CMU for the structural core and brick for the visible face. This combines strength, speed, and beauty in one wall.
CMU excels in load-bearing roles because its cells can hold reinforcing steel and grout. Brick is also strong, especially in veneer and bearing walls. The best choice depends on the wall’s job.
Yes. Neither brick nor CMU burns, so both offer excellent fire resistance. This makes either a safe choice for durable, protective construction.
Address I 900 W. Sproul Rd., Suite #202, Springfield, PA 19064
Phone I 502-689-4555 Email I Amy@employingbricklayers.org
© 2026 EBA. All rights reserved.